4 Comments
User's avatar
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 5, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Dominic Packer & Jay Van Bavel's avatar

It's part of another paper, but we find no effect of these different labels (e.g., climate change vs. climate awareness). We found no evidence that it polarizes. As such, we think that focus on terms like this is not a fruitful approach to addressing this issue. We plan to discuss this paper in a future issue of the newsletter so stay tuned to learn more.

Expand full comment
Dominic Packer & Jay Van Bavel's avatar

Actually, we shared that preprint in this newsletter. You can see the null effect by reading this pre-print: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/835yt

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 13, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Dominic Packer & Jay Van Bavel's avatar

Well, we tried 10 popular terms and none of them matter at all. I'd bet a good deal of money that climate awareness has no effect whatsoever. But feel free to run the study and prove me wrong. I'm super open minded. I'd just need to see real evidence rather than assertions and insults to change my beliefs here.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 13, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Dominic Packer & Jay Van Bavel's avatar

Our approach is to follow the data. To us, it doesn't matter what academics or business or government says. What matters is what works. If you read our paper, you'll see that some things work and others don't. Some academics and practitioners are likely mad about this because their pet idea doesn't work. But the data is the data.

Expand full comment